http://ms.foundation.org/our_work/broad-change-areas/economic-justice/2011-community-voices-on-the-economy-initial-findings

2011 Community Voices on the Economy Initial Findings

Read the summary of key findings.
Download these initial findings [PDF]

April 13, 2011

The 2011 Community Voices for the Economy survey, a nationwide poll just released by the Ms. Foundation for Women, shows that the American public wants the government to take a stronger economic role to help average Americans, especially in terms of job creation. In the midst of the current deficit-reduction frenzy in Washington DC, the public exhibits concern that belt-tightening will come at the expense of families and children.

“These findings fly in the face of what we’re hearing every day from politicians in Washington about deficit reduction and the role of government,” says Anika Rahman, president and CEO of the Ms. Foundation. “Most Americans see government as critical to helping the economy grow and families succeed. They are clearly concerned that the deficit-cutting mood on Capitol Hill will come at the expense of children and families.”


Desire for a Stronger Economic Role for Government

By a nearly twenty-point margin, Americans see the need for a stronger role for government in helping the economy work better for the average American. This desire has strengthened over the past year across the country.
  • When presented with two different points on view on this topic, 56 percent of Americans agree more that, “It is time for government to take a larger and stronger role in making the economy work for the average American.” In contrast, 36 percent choose the point of view that “Turning to big government to solve our economic problems will do more harm than good.”
  • The desire for a stronger economic role for government has grown slightly—by four points—from last year. In the 2010 Community Voices for the Economy, 52 percent of Americans agreed it was time for government to take a larger and stronger economic role, and 37 percent agreed that turning to big government would do more harm than good.
  • Over the past year, desire for a stronger economic role for government has increased across nearly all demographic subgroups. This is particularly true among women, who give a 33-point advantage to the argument for a stronger economic role for government (62 percent) over the argument that government would do more harm than good (29 percent agree). Among women, the desire for a stronger economic role has increased seven points over the past year, from 55 percent in 2010 to 62 percent currently. While men are more closely divided on this issue, more important is the fact that they have slightly favored wanting a stronger government role in the 2010 and 2011 surveys (49 percent agreeing more with a stronger government role in 2010 and 2011).

Focusing on Job Creation: Even if Deficit Increases in Short-Term

A robust majority of the general public still agrees that the government should be focusing on job creation and they support this even if job creation means increasing the deficit for the short-term.

  • Sixty-two percent of Americans agree that the government should focus on creating jobs, even if it means increasing the deficit in the short-term (24 percent strongly agree). Only 37 percent disagree (20 percent strongly disagree). Two-thirds of women (66 percent) and 57 percent of men agree that the government should focus on job creation.
  • Overall agreement with this position has increased by six points from 2010 (up to 62 percent from 56 percent).



Concern over Deficit Cutting that Impacts Children & Families

Americans exhibit concern that Washington’s deficit-cutting mood will come at the expense of families and children. Again, women are particularly concerned.

  • Nearly half of Americans (49 percent) say they would be extremely or very concerned if Congress—in its efforts to reduce the federal budget deficit—significantly cut spending on government programs that help families and children. Another third (34 percent) would be somewhat concerned, and only one in six would not be concerned (16 percent).
  • These concerns are particularly high among women, among whom 55 percent say they would be extremely or very concerned if spending for children and families was significantly cut. While there is a gender gap between men and women, men are still much more concerned than unconcerned about such cuts (43 percent would be extremely or very concerned; 20 percent would be not very or not at all concerned).

Survey Methodology

Lake Research Partners conducted the 2011 Community Voices for the Economy survey from March 15-24, 2011. The survey reached a total of 1,515 adults nationwide, including oversamples of 100 African American women, 100 Latinas, 100 Asian/ Pacific Islander/ Native Hawaiian women, and 100 men and women ages 18 to 29. Relevant cases from the base were folded into the oversamples. The oversamples have been weighted down to their accurate proportions for the U.S. general population. The data has been slightly weighted to reflect the attributes of the U.S. adult general population, based on U.S. Census data. The margin of sampling error for the overall sample is +/- 2.5 percentage points.

The national sample and interviewing were provided by Knowledge Networks using an address based sampling methodology (ABS) and was administered online. ABS is a random-sampling technique that involves probability-based sampling of addresses from the U.S. Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File, designed to account for cell-phone only households who are excluded from a landline-RDD sampling frame. Knowledge Networks supplies netbook computers and free Internet service to non-Internet households.

The 2010 Community Voices for the Economy survey, an RDD telephone survey of 1,004 adults nationwide, was conducted from January 19 to February 3, 2010.

Read the summary of key findings.
Download the initial findings memo [PDF]
show/hide
Change List
Remove List
Edit List Properties
show/hide
Change List
Remove List
Edit List Properties
   

Migrant Health Promotion works to make sure migrant farm workers throughout the US get access to health and health services, mobilizing migrant farm communities to fight for the services, resources, and rights they deserve. Learn more and view the slide show

show/hide
Change List
Remove List
Edit List Properties
Who
  Jane S. Comer  


[Jane S. Comer] I am a confident investor in the Ms. Foundation because in its nearly 40 years, it has built the knowledge and expertise to impact the lives of women throughout the US. And as the Ms. Foundation has already demonstrated expertise in effectively supporting sexuality education advocacy in key states across the country, I am confident that my contribution to the Ms. Foundation will catalyze real change for the issues I care most about. Read more

show/hide
Change List
Remove List
Edit List Properties

share ms.foundation.org:


Bookmark at Delicious Bookmark at Google Digg it Bookmark at Yahoo! Share on Facebook Tweet this Email This Page
Ms. Foundation for Women, 12 MetroTech Center, 26th Fl, Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone:(212) 742-2300|Fax: (212) 742-1653|Email: info@ms.foundation.org